2 ms·
I was just stating the fact that factoring 768 bit keys is still difficult (though doable given enough time/compute power). I'm not implying you should use 768
by YZF 13y ago
I was just stating the fact that factoring 768 bit keys is still difficult (though doable given enough time/compute power). I'm not implying you should use 768 bit keys.
I saw the slides and read various articles that followed and none of them seemed to be specifically concerned about 1024 bit RSA keys. Can you point me to where in the presentation slides that is emphasized as the main concern?
It's quite one thing to say we should be concerned that 1024 bit keys can be compromised and or to say DH/RSA is dead. I wasn't at the presentation so I don't know what was presented.
- YZF 13y agoTitle of thread is "Math Advances Suggest RSA Encryption Could Fall Within 5 Years (technologyreview.com) " Not: "Math Advances Suggest 1024 bit RSA keys may be factorable within 5 years"