> In logic, it's fruitless to try to place the burden of proof on a negative statement. That's unnecessary. We've already seen, via the leaks, that dragnet sur

> In logic, it's fruitless to try to place the burden of proof on a negative statement. That's unnecessary. We've already seen, via the leaks, that dragnet surveillance is happening. The NSA's claim that domestic communications are sacrosanct are put to lie by the revelations that the DEA and IRS are both using laundered NSA domestic surveillance data. We're now well beyond the need to prove that the government is in a state of sin with regard to the Constitution. The issue now is what remedies we'll pursue.