4 ms·
1 in 3.2 million doesn't really seem that unique to me. Once the sample size is larger by a factor of 10 - 100, I think this will be more valuable.
by rotskoff 13y ago
1 in 3.2 million doesn't really seem that unique to me. Once the sample size is larger by a factor of 10 - 100, I think this will be more valuable.
- igravious 13y agoFrom what I gather going by this site that I consulted (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/unique http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/unique) it seems that anything less than 2 would qualify you as unique. You may feel that as the sample set grows others may join your party but you have not told us why you believe this to be the case. I wouldn't be too sure, I would be more hesitant in reaching that conclusion. As it stands you are a unique snowflake and so am I.