4 ms·
I think most people, even those who follow politics, buy into the emotional experience rather than the actual politics. It makes people feel good to listen to a
by peterjancelis 13y ago
I think most people, even those who follow politics, buy into the emotional experience rather than the actual politics. It makes people feel good to listen to a great speech on paying back birth control pills, who cares that it's a really small issue compared to foreign policy or economic policy. The number of real 'political engineers' is really small anyway.
I don't even blame those people. For example I am a car enthusiast but not a car engineer, so while I may love the Porsche brand for the emotional connections it has in my mind, a car engineer who really knows what he's talking about may very well know for a fact that the tech for part X is better in a Toyota. I don't know and I don't care.
People just get disappointed in politicians because they operate in an incentive system that rewards them for not keeping their promises, because votes are a 'sunk revenue' once in office. If laws were made in a private market, they'd be incentivized to be more consistent.
- andy_ppp 13y agoWow, market based direct democracy, the media would wet themselves; here is an example headline: "Vote for higher welfare for lazy people? Get real?!? Vote down the poor food tax and WIN two year supply of McDonalds today![1]" [1] Terms and conditions apply.
- peterjancelis 13y agoI am not talking about democracy, I am talking about polycentric law.