4 ms·
If you read the article, you would know the answer. "A hundred years ago, if you were lucky enough to own a car then you probably knew how to fix it. People co
by fsckin 13y ago
If you read the article, you would know the answer.
"A hundred years ago, if you were lucky enough to own a car then you probably knew how to fix it. People could at least change the oil, change the tyres, or even give the engine a tune-up. I’ve owned a car for most of my adult life and they’re a mystery to me."
- wonderyak 13y agoAnd thats where it falls apart. If he were more honest with himself he'd say something like 'I know I can go online or pick up a manual and figure anything about my car that I'd want to.' Letting it remain a mystery is just perpetuating the ignorance people seem to cling to like a life raft. Figuring things out is fun and you learn new skills.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoThere are an almost unlimited number of things to figure out in modern life. IMO, it's not reasonable to judge someone for selecting which ones are most important to them. The important thing is to know it is possible if you had to -- it's just persistence. That said, if you wanted to pick one thing, computers probably have the lowest cost-to-benefit ratio of figuring stuff out, at least at the proxy-settings level of detail. I know how to change the oil in my car, but I can't do it much cheaper than the nine minute lube down the street, and it takes me four times as long.
- BruceIV 13y agoSame - I'm not super car-literate, but I was able to refill wiper fluid before I went on a long trip, and if it came down to it I could change the tire (I at least know where the jack is, and roughly where it goes under the car). But I don't change my own oil, because I can't really do it cheaper than the shop.
- bluedino 13y ago>> I’ve owned a car for most of my adult life and they’re a mystery to me. Right. But you bought a car to drive places, not because you like taking them apart or 'programming' them. You probably bought a computer for the latter.