posting at the top level for visibility. this appears to be an earlier, known case where lavabit complied. it does not seem to be the case that caused the shu

posting at the top level for visibility. this appears to be an earlier, known case where lavabit complied. it does not seem to be the case that caused the shutdown. see for example http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/08/lavabit-snowden/ http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/08/lavabit-snowden/ : Court records show that, in June, Lavabit complied with a routine search warrant targeting a child pornography suspect in a federal case in Maryland. That suggests that Levison isn’t a privacy absolutist. Whatever compelled him to shut down now must have been exceptional.