Why not improve something existing is a valid question, and I did look into it. The difficulty is that a P2P sync requires a completely difference design. Keep

Why not improve something existing is a valid question, and I did look into it. The difficulty is that a P2P sync requires a completely difference design. Keepass is pretty much a frontend to an embedded database. A P2P node need to have its own network facing component that acts independently of the frontend, to relay messages, respond to pairing requests, etc. This is why Bluepass has a frontend/backend architecture. It is a lot easier to create such a different architecture from scratch.