4 ms·
But they weren't being prosecuted, how is that obstruction? How would they prove that it was "evidence"?
by return0 13y ago
But they weren't being prosecuted, how is that obstruction? How would they prove that it was "evidence"?
- Torkild 13y agoYou're asking this of a government with a growing record of retroactively rewriting laws in its own favour?
- mrt0mat0 13y agowoah! ex post facto laws are illegal according to the constitution... oh wait... they don't follow that thing anymore do they?
- eliasmacpherson 13y agoRetroactive law for warrantless wiretapping, I am aware of. What other laws can you add to that list?
- shiven 13y agoPerhaps, the secret laws in secret courts that you (we) are neither aware of now, nor ever will.