4 ms·
There's a translation of Gödel's paper linked via his wikipedia entries https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hirzel/papers/c
by 6ren 13y ago
There's a translation of Gödel's paper linked via his wikipedia entries https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hirzel/papers/canon00-goedel.pdf https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.research.ibm.c... [google docs viewer]
curious facts: he died of starvation; he was a theist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_G%C3%B6del#Later_years_and_death http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_G%C3%B6del#Later_years_and...
- kybernetikos 13y agoI found your semicolon quite confusing there - it seemed to suggest that there was some relationship between being a theist and dying of starvation.
- Radim 13y agoOn the contrary. I imagine 6ren went to extra lengths to use a semicolon instead of a simple comma, as semicolons are used to emphasize independent clauses.
- kybernetikos 13y agoIndependent clauses can stand by themselves grammatically, that doesn't mean that their meanings are independent. e.g. > I hit him as hard as I could; he laughed at me. Those are 'independent clauses', but the semicolon emphasizes the connection between them.
- 6ren 13y agoRadim is right. I actually tried a couple of other forms ("and" and ","), but they seemed worse. Challenge: can you demonstrate a better way? I think the problem is not syntax but semantics: two unusual facts beg connection. BTW: getting back on topic, his starvation seems due to a lack of faith... if some connection is expected, perhaps the best solution is to supply one, perhaps the poignant He believed in God, yet died from lack of faith.