4 ms·
Rust does have a lot of potential, but don't underestimate how much change it has undergone lately, and will likely be undergoing in the future. The large amou
by PommeDeTerre 13y ago
Rust does have a lot of potential, but don't underestimate how much change it has undergone lately, and will likely be undergoing in the future.
The large amount and rapidity of change makes it difficult to use it seriously. It's nowhere near as stable as other newer languages like Go and Scala are, for instance.
Some experimental programs I wrote a mere 8 months ago are now basically unusable with recent versions of Rust due to language, syntax and standard library changes.
Unless you can constantly track Rust's development on a daily basis, and update your code accordingly, I'd be very hesitant to suggest using it for anything but throw-away code at this point.
- tyleregeto 13y agoThis is true, though I do believe it is a lot more stable than about 12 months ago(?) It reminds me of Go a couple of years ago, but that had "go fix" which would mostly update your source files to the newest revisions. That made early adoption a lot nicer. I'd love to see a "rust fix"