3 ms·
I don't know what to say to that - you provided a very vivid and emotionally-laden photo as what the "other side" was using to justify their position and now yo
by Amadou 13y ago
I don't know what to say to that - you provided a very vivid and emotionally-laden photo as what the "other side" was using to justify their position and now you say that the other side is not using vividness and emotion to make their point? What is your point?
- harryh 13y agoThat photo is a reminder if actual real problems, and quite big ones at that. It is not a mere play to emotion over logical reasoning.
- Amadou 13y agoSorry, I've found that arguments based on actual real problems don't resonate. Pointing out that bees kill more people each year in the US than terrorists, that the average american has 150x more chance of being killed by lightning than by a terrorist attack -- these straightforward statistical analyses don't convince because they aren't personal the way that photo is - practically everyone in the country spent weeks looking at versions of that photo. It just isn't the same.
- harryh 13y ago> Sorry, I've found that arguments based on actual real problems don't resonate. Pointing out that bees kill more people each year in the US than terrorists That's because this is a bad argument. Terrorism is about far more than just the number of fatalities.
- Amadou 13y agoYeah, it is about the emotional reaction that causes self-inflicted wounds far greater than the original attack. Which is why I'm talking about finding arguments that are also emotionally compelling.