By cropping every photo, DC hearing adjudicators should now throw out every alleged traffic violation (regardless of what the photographs purport to show). It

By cropping every photo, DC hearing adjudicators should now throw out every alleged traffic violation (regardless of what the photographs purport to show). It is simple why: 1. "DC hearing adjudicators have been throwing out citations whenever another vehicle was visible, creating the possibility of a spurious radar reading" 2. The accused to do not need to prove their innocence; rather the court has to prove the guilt of the accused 3. It now becomes impossible adjudicators to know if the another vehicle interfered with the radar 4. There is now __always__ reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty (since the camera system always crops photos) 5. The accused should always be found not guilty It is really a detestable perversion of justice for prosecution to systematically hide evidence. Why doesn't the prosecution just make their lives easier by throwing out all cases where there are other vehicles in the photo?