Here's a comment from the PI on the paper: http://blog.chembark.com/2013/08/06/a-disturbing-note-in-a-recent-si-file/#comment-52180 http://blog.chembark.com/20

Here's a comment from the PI on the paper: http://blog.chembark.com/2013/08/06/a-disturbing-note-in-a-recent-si-file/#comment-52180 http://blog.chembark.com/2013/08/06/a-disturbing-note-in-a-r... Compound 14 in the SI is an intermediate and has not been fully characterized, hence does not have a number in the manuscript. Wording and numbering of the compounds in the supporting information are wrong (on different levels!). Characterized compound 14 and 15a-c of the article correspond to compounds 154, 165a, 165b and 165c of the supporting info. Anything else is being dealt with by the editors of the journal as we speak.