3 ms·
Not to put words in the OP's mouth, but I think it's not so much about the USA's not respecting human rights as about that _and_ its having too much power for e
by geoka9 13y ago
Not to put words in the OP's mouth, but I think it's not so much about the USA's not respecting human rights as about that _and_ its having too much power for everybody's good.
By not having to pay taxes to USGov, they probably hope to make that power diminish.
EDIT: Good God, I've always been the guy arguing with your average America hater that we should count ourselves lucky that in the monopolar world we live in, the US is that only superpower that remains (as other candidates, such as Russia and China, would be a lot worse for everybody). I still think this is the case, but it's getting harder and harder to justify the position, with USGov seemingly hell bent on tranforming the country into a surveillance state.
- rayiner 13y agoWhat big liberal democracy isn't becoming a surveillance state? The U.K. seems 10-15 years ahead of us on that front, and people seem to like it just fine over there. Maybe the answer is just that pervasive surveillance isn't something that upsets people?
- Zigurd 13y agoMaybe that's because the US exports the surveillance state, not because the locals like it so much. It will be interesting to see if any US allies go their own way on this issue.