3 ms·
This is where I disagree. I do blame companies like Google for not fighting this more. At the very least they make users aware that these laws exist, even if th
by sixothree 13y ago
This is where I disagree. I do blame companies like Google for not fighting this more. At the very least they make users aware that these laws exist, even if they cannot detail specifics related to their surveillance involvement.
- MrKurtz 13y agoYou can't convincingly make that argument since you don't know what lawyers have been doing behind the closed doors of secret court rooms nor do you have knowledge of their relevant lobbying, you're just assuming things. No to forget that Google was the first to publish a transparency report in which it publishes the number of NSLs, so there is that - it's not correct to use "Google" as a shorthand for "US tech companies".
- smtddr 13y agoSee this comment : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6182179 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6182179 Fighting the USgov isn't a decision to take lightly regardless of how much money & resources you have. I cannot condemn a company that backs down from that battle. It could hurt an employee(s) significantly, or the whole company. While I agree they have the most resources to fight it, they're not immune to harm from USgov.
- eliasmacpherson 13y agoDo you remember google asking for your telephone number? They knew what they were doing.