3 ms·

I'm not sure I catch your drift. I don't see how being an accessory enters the equation at all (how can you be held responsible for providing information you s

by jlgreco 13y ago

I'm not sure I catch your drift. I don't see how being an accessory enters the equation at all (how can you be held responsible for providing information you simply do not have?), and there are no current laws concerning "assault guns".

unreal37 13y ago
I get the reasoning. If you provide the ability to communicate securely without a government backdoor, the government will treat you like you assist terrorists. "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." - George W. Bush, Sept 20 2001
- jlgreco 13y ago
  That ship has sailed though, unless they really feel like harassing Phil Zimmermann again...