>He wrote that he's "shocked, shocked" at what he found as a device to get more people to read the piece. I felt a strong impression that he had written this a

>He wrote that he's "shocked, shocked" at what he found as a device to get more people to read the piece. I felt a strong impression that he had written this article for the same reason as he wrote the exact opposite 4 years ago, i.e. self-serving commercial interest.