well any given set of supreme court judges may come to any particular conclusion, and i am not a lawyer so take it for what its worth: parallel construction as

well any given set of supreme court judges may come to any particular conclusion, and i am not a lawyer so take it for what its worth: parallel construction as concept probably there could be some debate over the specific implementation where neither defense, prosecution or judge is made aware of the actual facts of the case and the enforcement officials actually lie in sworn testimony? not sure why this would even have to go to the supreme court its plain simple and unambiguous perjury.