3 ms·
Bruce Schneier may be the wrong blogger for you to follow, then. He talks about trust all the time. To quote his recent book: > [T]oday, I passed several str
by dspeyer 13y ago
Bruce Schneier may be the wrong blogger for you to follow, then. He talks about trust all the time. To quote his recent book:
> [T]oday, I passed several strangers on the street without any of them attacking me. I bought food from a grocery store, not at all concerned that it might be unfit for human consumption. I locked my front door, but didn't spare a moment's worry at how easy it would be for someone to smash my window in. Even people driving cars, large murderous instruments that could crush me like a bug, didn't scare me.
>Most amazingly, this worked without much overt security. I don't carry a gun for self-defense, nor do I wear body armor. I don't use a home burglar alarm. I don't test my food for poison. I don't even engage in conspicuous displays of physical prowess to intimidate other people I encounter.
>It's what we call “trust.” Actually, it's what we call “civilization.”
His point is that we need trust. You can't actually watch for every possible betrayal. Trust in fear of retribution will suffice, but there needs to be some trust, or there can be no complex civilization.
- specialist 13y agore Civilization, I'm in the Robert Wright "Non-zero" camp, where progress is made when non zero sum alternatives are found to win/lose (zero sum) situations. As for Schneier, he's great, have a few of his books, read his blog. The distinction he doesn't make is between governance and civility. Or perhaps its a spectrum. If someone else has power over me, or delegated to them thru me (eg elections), I'm always going to be very skeptical. To the best of my knowledge, no one has found a better answer to the conundrum of governance than balance of powers (mutual distrust).