This line of reasoning drives me crazy. Who cares if it's maybe healthier than just about the shittiest food available for consumption? Honestly, can you think

This line of reasoning drives me crazy. Who cares if it's maybe healthier than just about the shittiest food available for consumption? Honestly, can you think of anything that wouldn't pass the test of "healthier than McDonalds"? Beyond that, the distracted 16 year old is not suggesting that you consume McDonalds as your sole source of nutrition (in fact, he doesn't care at all what you eat); pretty much everyone agrees that eating only McDonalds is a terrible idea, how that gets twisted into a defense of Soylent is just baffling.