4 ms·
5 is true for the cases where it results in static compiled output which is equivalent of say C's output. 6 you're adding metadata with type definitions. Enoug
by harrytuttle 13y ago
5 is true for the cases where it results in static compiled output which is equivalent of say C's output.
6 you're adding metadata with type definitions. Enough metadata is present in entirely statically typed languages to not do this.
7. How do you know if 1.000000000000000000001 is decimal or float?
It's weak in some places but strong in others. Knowing when to use each case effectively is the art.
- lucian1900 13y ago6. It's still necessary (or at least a good idea) to write serialisation models for most statically typed languages as well. the difference is minor 7. It's a float, unless you made it a Decimal explicitly. Arguably that's the wrong default, but almost no languages default to arbitrary precision/size everything. No, C's type system is totally unsound. It fails to catch very bad errors (pointer-related issues, null-related issues, etc.) and is perfectly happy to implicitly cast left and right. It's little more than a hindrance.