> If you can defend the idea that it is such within that context, I would like to hear the argument. But simply repeating time and again the same old "everyone

> If you can defend the idea that it is such within that context, I would like to hear the argument. But simply repeating time and again the same old "everyone has always done it" argument isn't making that case. I have no interest whatsoever in defending principles I do not and have never held. Google can defend themselves without me, in any event. Rather, I advocate something entirely different than "neutrality" as a principle from which to confront the real threat net neutrality was formed to prevent. That happens to align with what Google is currently doing, if not why it is doing it. The idea of "neutrality" has a lot of weird corner cases that make no sense at all in practice. I'd rather advocate something good than something... neutral.