6 ms·
This is nice on some levels, and they document their goals well (basically, to have features in one language that would otherwise require several). But I think
by makecheck 17y ago
This is nice on some levels, and they document their goals well (basically, to have features in one language that would otherwise require several). But I think they should have started by investing in Python itself.
While they wouldn't have their desired features "today", they'd have been working with a much larger audience. This would have led to more contributions in terms of PEP comments and feasibility testing, and ultimately more programmers benefiting from the new features.
- stcredzero 17y agoAll they need is a bit of syntax sugar and debugger integration on calls to Python, and they could at least benefit from many of the libraries. For all I know, the CLI already provides this.