4 ms·
The article mentions 10nm process size, whereas I thought the current state-of-the-art was 20nm. Is flash memory an exception? And if so, does that also apply t
by rwallace 13y ago
The article mentions 10nm process size, whereas I thought the current state-of-the-art was 20nm. Is flash memory an exception? And if so, does that also apply to DRAM? Or am I just confused?
- makomk 13y agoFlash and DRAM have highly regular structures, which means they tend to be ahead of everything else in terms of feature size (and also, feature size isn't an exact measurement anyway).
- mvgoogler 13y agoThe press-release said 10nm _class_ with a big asterisk next to it. I would be willing to bet that means something like 19nm.