4 ms·
Just because you mentioned the internet and "everything must be connected with Snowden," I wonder if the NSA is tapping all short-wave comms? You'd think yes, b
by 205guy 13y ago
Just because you mentioned the internet and "everything must be connected with Snowden," I wonder if the NSA is tapping all short-wave comms? You'd think yes, because that is what spooks on all sides used for encoded messages. But then again, with the focus on internet, maybe the SW-recorder got neglected in a back-room (unlikely, probably just another pipe into that Utah data center).
- mbell 13y agoMost likey: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_station https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_station Mid way through the opening paragraph mentions several people charged with spying based on surveillance of short-wave number stations.
- xradionut 13y agoIt's easier than you think to "capture" selected chunks of the RF spectrum. DOD, etc, have had this capability for decades, civilians have had scanners and broadband radios for decades. Amateurs can record entire HF bands and decode multiple CW and other signals in real time with modern receivers and computing power.
- ChikkaChiChi 13y agoTapping a thing and understanding what you are listening to are two totally different things. Theoretically broadcasting an encrypted message in which third parties cannot possibly have access to the endpoints is still the safest way to handle sensitive data. This is part of the reason why 'Numbers Stations' are so popular with us geeks.