I agree with the overreach of the law and possible, obvious abuses. However, police are able to arrest for a crime at any point of the process. That said, oth

I agree with the overreach of the law and possible, obvious abuses. However, police are able to arrest for a crime at any point of the process. That said, other than ones that aren't reversible (like murder), they usually let you commit the crime and then arrest you. This makes it easier to prosecute you. I don't necessarily have a problem with asset forfeiture just that it needs to be required to be associated with a conviction, there should be a cap on what the police get (to avoid overzealous use), and there should be a quick and logical appeal process to prevent innocents having property taken via 'splash damage'.