Let's take that premise to OCR then. This whole debacle started with JBIG2 settings that I guess duplicated(?) one section and inserted it where similar text ex

Let's take that premise to OCR then. This whole debacle started with JBIG2 settings that I guess duplicated(?) one section and inserted it where similar text exists. Only it was marginally similar. According to Adam (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6156418 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6156418) this is a known problem that Xerox, who call themselves document people for crying out loud, should have known and compensated for.