4 ms·
I don't think that anyone has denied that they are able to monetize users in some fashion. What is hotly debated though is whether or not they can monetize use
by brk 17y ago
I don't think that anyone has denied that they are able to monetize users in some fashion. What is hotly debated though is whether or not they can monetize users sufficiently enough to make those users profitable in the short and/or long term.
Facebook's overhead certainly appears to be quite substantial. They are literally building new datacenters and are running a ton of equipment. Even if you could theoretically fire all the sales, marketing and HR types, you'd still be left with a pretty big bill at the end of each month.
Various online sources say that Facebook has a little over 1,000 employees. Let's say the average employee is $80K fully loaded. That's $80M/year just in payroll. You haven't even talked about real-estate to sit those employees in, PCs for them to work on, or the servers and infrastructure to run the company.
Also, much of that revenue (for all practical purposes, maybe all of it) seems to be advertising related. There is a lot of talk about the declining values of online advertising, and no one seems to have cracked the system on how to do that advertising in a fully effective manner. So, Facebooks revenue is coming from a source that they don't have a strong ability to manage and control (vs., say, user subscription fees).
- Slzr 17y agoIts pretty much the situation in Google and no one doubts they are for the long run Your arguments are ok, except for the advertising which I think its pretty effective online, its just that its a mystery for me how Google gets such incredible PR.