3 ms·
They're probably referring to latency, which is very low (30ns). It still is disingenuous, but that's marketing.
by shenberg 13y ago
They're probably referring to latency, which is very low (30ns). It still is disingenuous, but that's marketing.
- vlasta2 13y agoI guess it is more accurate to talk about latency, because throughput can always be improved by accessing multiple cells in parallel.