6 ms·
Even worse than lost/stolen is damaged, IMO, just because it introduces a much bigger gray area. Let's say I lend someone my Canon 100-400mm, it comes back loo
by georgemcbay 13y ago
Even worse than lost/stolen is damaged, IMO, just because it introduces a much bigger gray area.
Let's say I lend someone my Canon 100-400mm, it comes back looking mostly okay but with a relatively small scratch on the front lens element that I'm sure wasn't there previously. Still works mostly fine, but now when I shoot with the sun in the frame, I get lens flare that didn't previously exhibit.
How do I prove the renter subtly damaged the lens, if it comes down to my word against theirs?
I would need a lot of iron clad assurances that I'm covered in return for renting out my various $1k+ lenses for a few tens of dollars.
Though ultimately, I don't currently live in a covered city (I'm in San Diego) so this is theoretical in my case.
- derwiki 13y agoYou're not the first to have this concern. So far, my policy has been that if anything happens (the lender is unhappy about his equipment) then CameraLends will send a replacement and take the broken equipment in exchange. Luckily, nothing has gone awry, yet. Would insurance make you feel better? Also, I just added San Diego to the list of available cities. Feel free to email me at adam@cameralends.com if you have any more questions or ideas.