Apologies. I thought you were objecting to "proprietary". I think we've just a semantic issue. How about "he knowingly caused proprietary source code to leav

Apologies. I thought you were objecting to "proprietary". I think we've just a semantic issue. How about "he knowingly caused proprietary source code to leave the control of its owner"? Although, as he did post to a public server, I think I can defend "released" if I need to. The word "encrypted" does not occur in the linked story, nor does it seem to be implied.