3 ms·
See also: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/3/24/ http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/3/24/ If anyone comes out with a website that purports to provide
by blinks 17y ago
See also: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/3/24/ http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/3/24/
If anyone comes out with a website that purports to provide quick access to information, it'll inevitably be compared to Google (or Yahoo, or Live Search, or whatever comes next). Slate's comparison is actually even pretty close; the author took the examples provided and tweaked them slightly.
For example, "running 4mph 30 minutes 5'10" 160 lbs 40 year male" provides an answer, but "golfing 4mph 30 minutes 5'10" 160 lbs 40 year male" doesn't. I think that his conclusion was the most interesting part, about "the eternal problem for any wannabe Google competitor[: ...] Google can easily co-opt such improvements -- and suddenly everyone's got a better Google."
- xiaoma 17y agoYeah, Google already functions as a basic calculator and unit conversion tool. Out of curiosity I tried seeing the the calories burnt were any different for a 60 year-old man or 9000 year-old man. Apparently, they aren't. http://www28.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=running+4mph+30+minutes+5%2710%22+160+lbs+9000+year+male http://www28.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=running+4mph+30+minut...