3 ms·
It would be naive to think that the paper will produce an article that disparages Amazon's labor and business practices, now that it is owned by the same man th
by wismer 13y ago
It would be naive to think that the paper will produce an article that disparages Amazon's labor and business practices, now that it is owned by the same man that is the CEO of Amazon. I'm not sure what his stake is in the company, but I assume it's significant to raise this issue.
- smackfu 13y agoGiven the traditional separation of editorial and business in newspapers, I wouldn't be shocked if the Post ran an Amazon hit piece just to test the boundaries.
- jessaustin 13y agoThe fact that this seems very plausible ought to give us pause when the actual event convinces us that they're still independent.
- jlgreco 13y agoDamned if they do, damned if they don't? That is a convenient position to hold. You can't be wrong!
- grimtrigger 13y ago> give us pause Parent's point is that WaPo/Bezos shouldn't be damned either way in this case.