4 ms·
In the place of analysis you have put a lot of snark which seems to be analysis. If another company with a different business had posted - one with an incentiv
by pekk 13y ago
In the place of analysis you have put a lot of snark which seems to be analysis.
If another company with a different business had posted - one with an incentive to say there is a shortage of high-skilled engineers, like most big companies hiring engineers - would you be implying their claims are false too? If not, you are being partial; if so, your method is just to say that whatever anyone says must be wrong because it was in their interest.
3 out of the top 10 jobs where H-1B requested does not equal a third of employees, and it isn't clear that those 3 do see a shortage.
Also, in case of a shortage in a specialized area, why do we assume that companies cannot ever do anything to train employees in that specialization themselves? If you need piles of Java programmers who know SOAP, get some Java programmers and let them train on SOAP.
If you are in the business of producing (say) cars, you have to make capital investments, including investments in human capital - why should software be a special snowflake?
- moocowduckquack 13y agoOk, without the snark, I am specifically saying that this is not journalism. It is an advert with suspect claims.
- opendais 13y agoWould you at least concede that the H1B process is highly vulnerable to someone abusing it by re-titling jobs/requirements with a lawyer's help? I'd agree the data/method/motivation is highly suspect.
- moocowduckquack 13y agoWith a lawyer's help, many things are possible.
- bradleyjg 13y ago> If you are in the business of producing (say) cars, you have to make capital investments, including investments in human capital - why should software be a special snowflake? It's perfectly legal for a car company to import sub-assemblies from abroad. Why should we have free movement of capital and goods, but not labor?