3 ms·
> but apparently the jurisprudence hasn't caught up to its use in unlawful surveillance. How is that possible? Surely evidence that is obtained that is derived
by foobarqux 13y ago
> but apparently the jurisprudence hasn't caught up to its use in unlawful surveillance.
How is that possible? Surely evidence that is obtained that is derived from an illegal search is inadmissible.
- tptacek 13y agoI think (repeating another comment) you've misread the Reuters story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6160632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6160632
- foobarqux 13y agoI haven't I was pointing out, as I see others already have, that the evidence in the subsequent search is tainted. But it seems there might be some technicalities for why it is not.