3 ms·
Strikes me as obvious pandering. Obviously for 99% of users Tor is more headache and overhead for no real benefit. Not to mention that most users would say "Why
by ebbv 13y ago
Strikes me as obvious pandering. Obviously for 99% of users Tor is more headache and overhead for no real benefit. Not to mention that most users would say "Why did my internets get so slow?" and not understand what was going on.
- rthomas6 13y agoI'd assume one would have to manually enable it? At least for non .onion sites.
- BrendanEich 13y agoYes, you assume correctly -- it would be competitive-browser suicide to turn on by default. Thinking either that we would do such a thing, or that I'd pander with such a non-starter (or pander at all, at my age and lack of political ambition) is just dumb. What would be smart, which we are looking at: adopting, supporting, and bundling Tor (opt-in). As I tweeted.