3 ms·
Assuming (1) it's parallelisable (2) this is an accurate enough similation, and (3) a whole human brain is 100 times bigger, we'd need 406083k*100 processors wh
by cabalamat 13y ago
Assuming (1) it's parallelisable (2) this is an accurate enough similation, and (3) a whole human brain is 100 times bigger, we'd need 406083k*100 processors which is about 20 billion.
We could do it now (hardware-wise), if we really wanted to.
- pervycreeper 13y agoAdmittedly, I was just spitballing from the parent poster's numbers. But the idea that brain simulation is not that far off still seems plausible given those extra considerations.
- mischanix 13y agoIf each processor draws down 50 Watts, 20 billion of them would draw 1 TW. The US uses on average ~3 TW across every power source (including e.g. combustion engines).