I suppose that would be disingenuous... if anyone were to suggest it. You have no idea, of those government provisions you listed, what the actual costs are. Y

I suppose that would be disingenuous... if anyone were to suggest it. You have no idea, of those government provisions you listed, what the actual costs are. You won't be able to get the most efficient allocation of resources, because it's not a market allocation (people freely paying), but a political allocation. Oh, and I don't care if a drug company is benevolent. Just that they are free to offer me the goods at a price that isn't rigged (as by regulation of competitors, for example).