I admit, I'm not sure what the argument is exactly. Nature is chaotic, therefore socialism? I cannot speak for Randians or Objectivists, but an advocate of a p

I admit, I'm not sure what the argument is exactly. Nature is chaotic, therefore socialism? I cannot speak for Randians or Objectivists, but an advocate of a private property society does not have a problem with insurance. Insurance is a perfectly legitimate good that can be provided in markets. It's the whole pay-us-or-go-to-prison monopoly thing that doesn't sit well. Further, many rich business people are rich precisely because of government privilege, including protections of so-called intellectual property. You'd be hard pressed to name a successful person in modern times who hasn't made or at least maintained his riches because of some special privilege.