2 ms·
I can back clarle up, YUI is oftern misinterpreted as the old, while in reality it's rocksolid and good enough to build large stuff. Unfortunately the entry-cos
by X4 13y ago
I can back clarle up, YUI is oftern misinterpreted as the old, while in reality it's rocksolid and good enough to build large stuff. Unfortunately the entry-cost is too high, that could be improved by a wrapper class that allows jquery minded people to go faster. http://yuilibrary.com/ http://yuilibrary.com/ could need a design overhaul, it looks like Java Documentation http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/documentation/index.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/documentation/....
What could be the reason, Bad marking maybe, idk?
YUI not only has pretty good damn support for ARIA and their templates conforms easily conform to WCAG AAA. What I like about YUI is that they continually improve and reinvent themselves. Something you cannot say about extjs and jqueryui for example.
PS: In 2002 - 2004 (not sure when), I've sent a huge css file (it resetted every tag) to a friend working at Yahoo and I was glad when they announced YUI CSS a month later which may or may not have built on my code, it remarkably defined the web. Today you can see html5boilerplate borrowing these ideas Yahoo once put into the mainstream with their awesome Framework.