3 ms·

An open discussion has the benefit of generating valuable feedback for PG.

• sjtgraham 13y ago
  I may or may not agree with you, but my comment only considers HN rules and that there is a strong precedent for these HN-policy meta-discussions to be killed by mods.
  • northwest 13y ago
    > there is a strong precedent for these HN-policy meta-discussions to be killed by mods. If this is true, it would be a pretty sad state of affairs. If such a discussion comes up, it's because of a lack of transparency.
    • ColinWright 13y ago
      It is true, and for me it is not a sad state of affairs. I've seen more sites killed by excessive meta-discussion than almost anything else. More, true "transparency" frequently just leads to more meta-discussion about the minutiae, and constant bickering about nuances of interpretation. Personally, I think PG is striking a good balance. If you disagree you are, of course, free to go elsewhere and/or start an alternative community, and solve all the problenms in your own way.
  • josephpmay 13y ago
    To be perfectly honest, I hadn't reviewed the HN guidelines in awhile, and I forgot about that one. If I have an issue in the future I'll be sure to do that, however, I think this discussion is valuable to the HN community, and it would be unwise for me to delete this post.