define "open-standards" vs. walled-garden? when a project is open source with a permissive license as dart is, how can it become a walled garden? walled garde

define "open-standards" vs. walled-garden? when a project is open source with a permissive license as dart is, how can it become a walled garden? walled garden to me is a closed platform, where nobody can change or see whats happening inside.. how that reality maps to dart? and people believe things like javascript are open standard, just because it have a commite? isnt that why javascript is stuck in the nineties and cant move forward?! Dart is a cool, modern and fast language designed from the ground up to give us a choice against the ugly javascript.. nobody really likes javascript, people just have to deal with it, because is there no option (until coffescript, dart, typescript and others came by) why is so bad to have options? and what could be the evil plan of google behind the creation of dart? there a lot of things i disagree the way google has being doing things.. but this technological fanatism will hurt us all.. Personally i dont care it came from google, or any other company.. actually from what i understand from the hystory of dart, it came from a V8 developer and its passion to make a better language that could be better for bigger projects and compile faster.. isnt cool that google believe in this project and put so many badass vm people behind it to make it work?! i just dont understand what could be bad in this sort of move.. its innovation, and its open.. its miles away from a walled garden.. and any browser or any application can adopt it and make it even more open and widespread adopted