4 ms·
These places are owned by many private companies, who might not understand the threats they face, or there is a culture where it is not a priority, plus there i
by WestCoastJustin 13y ago
These places are owned by many private companies, who might not understand the threats they face, or there is a culture where it is not a priority, plus there is no standard between these many companies, each has rolled their own solutions. Some might not be connected to the internet, but others are, there is a total mismatch between them. So, government has started to step in, by creating cybersecurity standards for infrastructure [1]. This will hopefully create a standard for everyone to start locking down their infrastructure in a consistent and reproducible way. This also plays into the moves to reduce data centers across the government [2], so they can create a standard, and hopefully reduce their security exposure.
[1] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-13/obama-orders-cybersecurity-standards-for-u-s-infrastructure.html http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-13/obama-orders-cybers...
[2] http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-07-28/business/40859100_1_data-centers-federal-agencies-savings http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-07-28/business/40859...
- stretchwithme 13y agoAnd many are monopolies that have little incentive to prepare for black swans. They will just be bailed out or allowed to raise rates to clean up a catastrophe. Tokyo Electric Power Company in Japan was allowed to borrow billions after their colossal failure at Fukushima. A failure that could have been avoided with better planning. But with no competition, what incentive was there?