4 ms·
I haven't seen any benchmarks that make it seem like Angular is "painfully slow." AFAIK, its on par or faster than ember.js and knockout.js. What would you use
by wasd 13y ago
I haven't seen any benchmarks that make it seem like Angular is "painfully slow." AFAIK, its on par or faster than ember.js and knockout.js. What would you use instead for MV* in the browser?
- alexfringes 13y agoI haven't actually seen any decent benchmarks between those systems as a whole. Most comparisons seem to shy away from that (between some candidates it probably doesn't make sense to benchmark anyways). But if you've seen anything interesting on that front, I'd be thankful if you could post it. And, you're right, so far Angular hasn't let me down regarding speed.
- alanh 13y agoOur relatively simple Angular app was regularly consuming 100% CPU for literal minutes and ate up 600MB of RAM until we dramatically reduced not-actually-that-crazy number of API calls we made on load (from less than 100, mostly prefetching data – to less than 15, pr-fetching sacrificed). It is mostly related to Angular’s “dirty checking” and ajax management. I have met others with the same problem. (Their solution? Use Backbone!)
- wasd 13y agoI think its a lot to ask but would you consider making a sample application that replicates this same behaviour?