3 ms·
They'd basically be using an expert to testify that doing something didn't require said expert. Like having an auto mechanic testify that changing your oil is
by jlgreco 13y ago
They'd basically be using an expert to testify that doing something didn't require said expert. Like having an auto mechanic testify that changing your oil is dead simple.
I mean, it is probably possible to convincingly make that case, but it seems a bit tricky.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- d23 13y agoI'd think it would be more akin to getting an astrophysicist to testify that "F = ma" is something taught in an introductory physics class and isn't indicative of someone being an expert.