3 ms·
I see nothing wrong with preventing the publication of the exploits UNTIL they are resolved. If the company responsible for the security system does not want to
by umsm 13y ago
I see nothing wrong with preventing the publication of the exploits UNTIL they are resolved. If the company responsible for the security system does not want to resolve the security vulnerability, then they should be published.
Even though this scientist first discovered the vulnerability, it doesn't mean that someone else won't do so in the near future.
- tlrobinson 13y agoIndeed, once the existence of a flaw is known, but not the specifics, it's often easy to find the flaw since you know where to look.
- woud420 13y agoQuite a few companies are based on finding those exploits and reverse engineering them in order to allow 3rd party remote starters to function correctly. It's nothing new and has been around for a while. I've worked for 3 years at one, very exciting job!