3 ms·
Any chance this is already being used nefariously? It would explain stories like this: http://www.today.com/news/police-admit-theyre-stumped-mystery-car-thefts-
by iamben 13y ago
Any chance this is already being used nefariously? It would explain stories like this: http://www.today.com/news/police-admit-theyre-stumped-mystery-car-thefts-6C10169993 http://www.today.com/news/police-admit-theyre-stumped-myster...
(also discussed on HN a month back: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5826486 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5826486)
- bdg 13y agoOf course it's already being used. When Average Joe thinks about a criminal he thinks some thug hood with a brick. The professional criminals are affiliated with syndicates and mafias have money and resources. They can hire the talent able to figure out decoding these trivial radio signals.
- lgeek 13y ago> They can hire the talent able to figure out decoding these trivial radio signals. I don't expect even older radio access systems to be that simple to abuse. For example this application note from Atmel[0] describes such a system. It uses an AES-based MAC and a rolling window counter to prevent message spoofing and replay. I wouldn't bet this implementation is actually secure, but it's not so trivial to attack. Please note I'm not saying that criminals haven't abused vulnerabilities in these systems, just that it's not a simple matter of 'decoding these trivial radio signals'. [0] http://www.atmel.com/images/atmel-2600-avr411-secure-rolling-code-algorithm-for-wireless-link_application-note.pdf http://www.atmel.com/images/atmel-2600-avr411-secure-rolling...