4 ms·
She did perpetuate a hoax.
by drewblaisdell 13y ago
She did perpetuate a hoax.
- droithomme 13y agoHow do you figure? Did the JTTF interrogate her husband and search their house? Did they ask about pressure cookers? Are they now saying it was because of a web search that they initiated the interrogation and search? Yes or no? To say this is a hoax is to say these things did not happen. What is your evidence of this?
- tptacek 13y agoNo, "the JTTF" didn't interrogate her husband. The Suffolk PD did, because the employer called them. It's hard to respond to the other questions because they're premised on the first.
- droithomme 13y agoIs your assertion that she is lying when she says they identified themselves as part of the JTTF which is overseen by the FBI and includes local police force members throughout the US whose salary and expenses they pay while working on JTTF tasks? Or are you saying that they lied to her in saying they were JTTF. You are very clearly stating here "'the JTTF' didn't interrogate her husband", meaning that she is lying when she says they told her that or they told her that and were lying. Please cite your evidence of this claim.
- tptacek 13y agoYes. I'm saying she's being dishonest about what happened. Also, you continue to use the term "the JTTF", which is misleading. The FBI has formally denied being involved in the interview, and the Suffolk PD just announced that they were behind it. It's the blog author (and you) who invoked (and now continue to invoke) the FBI, and to invoke "the JTTF".
- jmccree 13y ago"The JTTF" didn't interrogate anyone. Detectives from the Suffolk County PD, who may also be members of a JTTF and identified themselves as such, received a tip and followed up on it. What's misleading is trying to say the investigation was JTTF-lead, VS a local pd investigation who's outcome may be shared with the JTTF.