It's possible that the public does understand the issue and disagrees with you. Disagrees based on what? Labeling someone as traitor doesn't constitute a ratio

It's possible that the public does understand the issue and disagrees with you. Disagrees based on what? Labeling someone as traitor doesn't constitute a rational counter-argument to concerns regarding privacy and government checks and balances in this case. Such argument should start with something like "I feel these programs are necessary because" and end with something that doesn't involve ultra-generic buzzwords.