3 ms·
That's quite disturbing. Ok, it was posted on a social media, which may not be perceived as needing as much quality work than a press paper, etc. But how could
by oelmekki 13y ago
That's quite disturbing. Ok, it was posted on a social media, which may not be perceived as needing as much quality work than a press paper, etc.
But how could a journalist be such on the affirmative without presenting any source ? We can't even see the facebook post he's talking about. The guy reacts to a shitstorm by providing unsourced opinion with a well established media name to link a cop operation with a stock firework picture supposed to be posted in USA on 4th.
That's at least lacking rigorous work.
- declan 13y agoYes, it's lacking "rigorous" work. It's a G+ post, which is almost by definition not "rigorous." Sheesh. Would you like a refund on your subscription fees?
- oelmekki 13y agoThanks, but I'm not subscribed. Actually, I wouldn't mind if it was not making HN home. And yes, I think with your reputation, you're expected not to have weak public opinion. That's a responsibility which come with social weight, sorry about that (and to be clear : I'm ok with you having unsourced opinions, just not when it implies influencing people).